I imagine too that when most UK politico-type people think of the Republican nominations (when you've pulled yourself away from Obama and Hillary) you think of two people, Giuliani and McCain, maybe Mitt Romney as well simply because of the coverage he's received as a result of him being a Mormon. But do you think of Ron Paul? Do you even know who he is?
Ron Paul is, according to the Guardian (which is disparaging of every Republican candidate would you believe?!), "barely even a Republican except in name" who "supports various crazy ideas, like abolishing tax." This said though, when it comes to online support, it at least appears like the man has the momentum of Dean and could cause some shockwaves. Whether that means he will make it all the way remains to be seen (it's unlikely), but Ron Paul is a name we may start to hear more in the UK coverage of the primaries.
Currently he's riding high online. He's the second most searched term on Technorati after "YouTube", and he's more popular than the rest if in the Facebook stakes, as well as big section of the Republican blogs. He is, at the moment it seems, the one Republican candidate that is the hot ticket to talk up. So who is he? And what does he stand for? Well, it seems, if you ask a lot of his supporters he is the man that is standing up for traditional conservatives position on taxing and spending and challenge what it sees as a betrayal by the Bush Administration of those principles. He is, they say, the heir to the forefathers of the US Constitution.
The strength of his Internet support has not gone unnoticed either. This weekend the Washington Post ran a piece on it (requires free registration) and it's clear from watching some of things that Paul says, and comparing it with his record that, dare I say it, he's a politician with a conviction who really does seem to mean it - although High Office often changes people as good old fashioned realism comes into play.
One of his more obsessive supporters, who is quoted in the Wasington Post, is actually a friend of mine called Brad, who blogs at Crossed Pond, what I find most interesting are the reason he gave the Post for his avid support,
I'm not supporting him because I think he could get the nomination. I'm supporting him because I think he can influence the national conversation about what the role of government is, how much power should government have over our lives, how much liberty should we give up for security. These are important issues, and frankly, no one's thinking about them as seriously and sincerely as Ron Paul."I think it's true to say that It's very unlikely that Ron Paul will win the nomination, but, like any leadership campaign, the journey to the end is one of debate, and there is no doubt that Paul is asking BIG questions in that debate. Whilst I don't fully agree with him on the issue of Iraq (and to be honest I think he would change his tune when faced with the realism of making the decision) the questions he's asking about the role of Government, the role of spending, the role of taxation, whilst importantly doing it all from a GOP platform is certainly sparking interest and support.
The question of course remains - as I think John Cruddas has pointed out in the Labour Deputy Leadership contest - how well Internet support actually translates into votes. But still, as we watch from this side of the pond, the race for the Republican nomination is by no means over, and Ron Paul's influence on what positions the front runners advocate in the coming months will probably be far more significant than many realise.
8 comments:
You forgot to mention that Ron named his son Rand....
How it translates into votes is important (and unknown) but, additionally, it can help raise cash (and cheaper than the more traditional methods of raising cash).
The votes thing in part, I would say, comes down to how well internet activity replaces television advertising; the extent to which that works will depend on your target demographic. Ron Paul, counterintuitively, appears to appeal to a fairly young crowd.
The two things you need to know about Ron Paul.
1) He's a libertarian.
2) He's not Ron Jeremey.
Wow, what a hero. It is such a shame there is no similar option here in the UK. Regardless of whether such a candidate would win, just being able to register your support for someone who extolls the virtues freedom might prove a fruitful method of curtailing the powers of the state.
I've known about Ron Paul for quite some time. He's quite well known in Libertarian circles for his literal interpretation of the US Constitution - not for him a 'living' document.
He believes in:
[1] No foreign interventions - you cannot have an Empire abroad without tyranny at home.
[2] No Federal 'pork' - AFAIK he has voted against every Government spending plan.
[3] The return of constitutionally 'sound money'. ie. abolishing the fiat US dollar.
[4] No 'standing army' [which the constitution limits to 2 years].
[5] Restriction of Federal gov to the 5 explicit and 7 implied powers granted by the Constitution.
etc etc etc
See here for speeches and statements.
[I don't think he would have made a 'realist' decision on Iraq. If the American people suddenly got all Constitutionalist and voted him in there would have been no pressure to invade since the self-same American people would have recognised such an act as Constitutionally unsound].
That "Ron Paul" or at least his supporters are all over the internet right now.
Even LGF has started to run polls with "Ron Paul" as an answer, no matter what the question is.
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=25896_Poll-_Should_the_US_Fund_Terrorists&only
"Should the US fund terrorists
Yes
No
Undecided
Ron Paul"
LGF isnt a ron paul supporter by the way.
Didn't LGF get in some argument about having Ron paul on a poll?
yeah he did. lots of hate mail.
so Ron Paul got put back on. he even created a Ron Paul poll here:
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=25550&only
v.funny.
but its also important to point out that Ron Paul is part of a bigger , growing, grassroots "back to basics" movement in the U.S. - Free Talk Radio, the Free State Project, the Vermont secessionist movement:
http://www.freetalklive.com/
http://www.freestateproject.org/
http://www.vermontrepublic.org/
If this gains traction amongst large parts of the electorate, Europe might wake up someday in the future to find that the U.S. military umbrella has gone home - an umbrella that has effectively subsidised the European welfare state since WW2.
Post a Comment