![](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ZI9ZC-oL5KQ/Rn9VXyK0HqI/AAAAAAAABWU/quLi7cEMI88/s200/newlabour.gif)
However, this morning it is back. It's not "new Labour, new Britain" anymore though. Now it's "new Labour for Britain" (draped in a Union flag). So why the sudden reversal? Has there been some snap focus group research that show the "Labour" brand remains more tainted than the "new Labour" one? Or is it just a sop to the Blairites? One thing is for sure though, there's absolutely nothing "new" about the Labour leadership team.
1 comment:
A rest is as good as a change. But the "new" is a real pain and should have been left out in the cold.
Post a Comment