In 2006-07 the project was abandoned having cost the taxpayer £143 million. Now here's the amusing thing, according to the DWP Minister, Jonathan Shaw,
Of the total investment in BPRP, £73 million of the £143 million has been of continuing value to the Department. This is detailed in the Jobcentre Plus 2006-07 annual accounts.In other words, £70 million of the money spent has not been of any continuing value, i.e. almost 50% of the amount spent was completely wasted.
Note also the way the whole sum is called "investment"? This is the classic New Labour redefinition of a word in practice. Investment actually means the use of money or capital in order to gain an appreciative value of some sort.
Here, the DWP is admitting that £70 million of the total spent did not provide any appreciative value, but they're still going to use the word investment to define it anyway.
The value of investments can go down as well as up, as the Financial Services Authority would have us say. Would that journos asked this as a question to the government every time they announce a new 'investment' in public services.
ReplyDelete"In other words, £70 million of the money spent has not been of any continuing value, i.e. almost 50% of the amount spent was completely wasted."
ReplyDeleteYes, but the other £73 million was only "of continuing value" as an object lesson in how not to run a IT project in such an utterly fuckwitted manner.
Of course, in government such lessons have a short shelf life - like about 5 fucking minutes.
We're so lucky that there isn't a massive recession, when the DWP will need every penny they can get. Oh hang on...Oh bugger..
ReplyDelete