Will the high-minded importance of not doing anonymous attack things online really be more important to them when the target of such anonymous attacks is someone they're currently attacking? A moral and ethical dillema to be sure!
You'll take note that, unlike them, I shan't being making deliberate insinuations about who is behind it. Rather I'll just pass comment and ponder on whether there will be condemnation, or whether they'll be another theory that it's right wingers trying to frame them again.
Note: Such a theory should it appear will not be a conspiracy theory and if anyone suggests it is, they shall be accused of smearing and making "false claims"™ against those sane people positing said theory. Said theory will also not be allowed to be called "conjecture" even though it will be a flawed inference based on presumptive and defective evidence.
Note II: Should a theory surface I'm guessing it will be almost the same as last time. "Right wingers, set it up to frame them as nasty. " The only difference this time will probably be that I am using the fact that I was innocent last time as cover to actually do it this time (click here for reference).... then again I might be wrong, the anonymous aspect may just be brushed aside with the argument that the account is "fair comment".
8 comments:
To be fair, I'd be more inclined to suspect DK, but he probably has more class. He would also probably prefer to take Dorries apart using his own blog rather than a twitter account!
I ignored them myself and warned others off them. Then they stopped/slowed tweeting, as they were starved of oxygen. Until now.
So 'well done' you.
On your other nonsense:
GFY. You only have yourself to blame if you run around (by your own admission) sock-puppeting people and deliberately trying to waste their time.
Bye.
Hah, I love the way you still try to justify your insinunations on the basis of "well you had form so guilty until proven innocent". And to think you scream about police injustices and the like. It's a bit like the comments on your blog that still imply that I have called you more times than you know to be true.
Tim, you are the biggest hypocrite going. I'll give you credit, you rarely lie outright. Instead you just manipulate and insinuate known facts to fit with your own perceived realities. Unlike me, who is not ashamed to say, yes I;m partsian, you pretend not to be but so blatently are.
Love you sweetcheeks
xxx
Have you ever thought perhaps you've got a bit too much time on your hands?
"I ignored them myself and warned others off them. Then they stopped/slowed tweeting, as they were starved of oxygen. Until now."Yes, and if it had been say a Tom Watson priofile you wouldn't have done a lengthy post of fake moral outrage at the "false claims" and disgusting way someone was hiding behind anonymity. :rolleyes:
"Have you ever thought perhaps you've got a bit too much time on your hands?"For what? Writing a post on a blog? Always.
Oh I don't know, Dizzy... have you seen her twat? I suppose after pushing out 3 babies it could, conceivably, be massive...
:rolleys:
Post a Comment