That this House, while recognising the outstanding mangement skills of Alan Curbishley in rejuvenating the form of West Ham, expresses disgust at the decision of the Premier League Commission, which found West Ham guilty of serious breaches of the League's rules, enough to warrant a fine of £5.5 million, but did not deduct any points; notes that Middlesbrough was deducted three points when breaching Premiership rules; further notes that the fine of £5.5 million is a quarter of the guaranteed minimum £20 million plus West Ham will get next season by being in the Premiership; notes that West Ham was found guilty of repeated lying and deceit, that the innocent club relegated in place of the guilty club, West Ham, will automatically lose £28 million and will have to make large-scale redundancies despite the fact that they have done nothing wrong; believes that the Premier League has shown favouritism towards West Ham; and supports any club which pursues other avenues in order to get the natural justice which the Premiership hierarchy is unwilling to give to the less glamorous members of its own Premiership League.Should you be wondering, Godsiff is a life-long fan of Charlton Athletic, but this motion has nothing to do with Charlton getting relegated, it's about principles.... honest!
Friday, May 11, 2007
A principled Labour MP?
I couldn't help but laugh when I read this motion about West Ham from Roger Godsiff, MP for Birmingham Sparkbrook and Small Heath.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Nothing wrong in that Motion, perfrectly acceptable.
Not that I have a vested interest or anything being a fellow Charlton supporter, of course. ;-)
West Ham need to go down or Dale gets one over on my New Year predictions. Roger Godsiff walks on water. Dale saves. But Wigan/Watford/Sheffield/Charlton score on the rebound.
Post a Comment