A vision for our country to pioneer and be the first to achieve the day when it becomes the norm for:The last sentence is the killer that sets the tone for what is to come. Greater social authoriarianism and increased interference. There will be very little that is voluntary in Brown vision of volunteering based on that last sentence.
* Every person to be asked to give some of their income to a charitable cause,;
* Every young person to volunteer some time while in education;
* Every employer has a volunteering scheme for their employees; and
* Every retired person considers helping others with their life's experience and skills.
Supported at each point by an enabling and empowering government that does what it can to make this possible.
In Brown's world the state will have an ever increased role in dictating our actions. To quote a wise man from Croydon, Brown is essentially advocating the "nationalisation of free time". God help us all.
12 comments:
Fantastic news. I have always felt that we did not have enough government interference in our lives...
NOT!
What a scary nasty man.
I also think that kind of thing will go down like a lead balloon with the electorate so good.
This sort of volunteering was very much in vogue in the Army I recall.
Whoever would have thought that it would be Labour that would seek to bring back National Service, albeit in a post-modern form applied to everyone?
What a very scary thought.
Every young person to volunteer some time while in education
How is this different from Cameron's proposed National Schooleaver Volunteer Programme?
Every employer has a volunteering scheme for their employees
How is this different from David Cameron and Steve Hilton's schtick about Corporate and Social Responsibility?
Every retired person considers helping others with their life's experience and skills.
How is this different from David Cameron's proposals to pay grandparents to child mind in order to bridge the generational gap?
Broon is our man. We need him in Downing St. as soon as possible.
James the answer to your questions are easy. Read the last sentence and place the things Gordon Brown says in that context. Brown is clearly saying the state will bring about these things throuigh coercion. I don't beleive Cameron is saying that.
Brown shirts?
James Hellyer, the diffence between these proposals and Cameron's is that Brown's method for doing everything is through central government legislation.
Which is exactly how David Cameron proposes to enact his ideas, Mike. Remember that he's considerin g making his schooleaver volunteer programme compulsary and that presumably proposed payments to Grannies who babysit would also come via the state...
I really don't see this is a difference between Brown and Cameron. The former is inclined to use the state to solve problems, the latter thinks it can bring people together "to make things happen".
Paternalist Conservatives see the state as every bit as much of a useful tool as Brown does.
I was unaware that Cameron had formally announced the details of any polices. I'm also not aware of him saying the volunteer scheme was to be compulsory. I recall there would be encouragment and incentive, but I do not recall compulsion. I'm still not seeing the lrevant of your grandparent comment to Brown's though, apart from the word "retired".
I was unaware that Cameron had formally announced the details of any polices.
He has announced various ideas, but not on any detailed level.
I'm also not aware of him saying the volunteer scheme was to be compulsory.
I didn't say that Cameron had said it was to be compulsory, but rather that from its first announcement onwards he had said he was condisering making it compulsory (and still hasn't ruled that option out).
The point, of course, is that his refusal to rule out such an option makes the dichotomy you're offering with Brown entirely false in this instance.
I'm still not seeing the lrevant of your grandparent comment to Brown's though, apart from the word "retired".
The point is that Cameron woulkd also propose using central government legislation "restore the relationship between the generations".
In other words, his proposals have a remarkable similarity in aim and approach to Brown's, and mark him out as someone not afraid to use the tools of the state to achieve social policy goals.
I think the difference between the two men on social policy is more a matter of emphasis than you might suggest. That's likely to remain the case until either man fleshes out his ideas.
Labour Makes You Free
Post a Comment