tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22202011.post7380532310400229924..comments2023-12-11T08:49:46.305+00:00Comments on Dizzy Thinks: Is this a remotely credible answer?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22202011.post-81438557016124683302007-02-25T13:19:00.000+00:002007-02-25T13:19:00.000+00:00indeed that does make sense.indeed that does make sense.dizzyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04250325010662356883noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22202011.post-69710002141760338042007-02-25T12:49:00.000+00:002007-02-25T12:49:00.000+00:00Note the wording of the written answer: it is that...Note the wording of the written answer: it is that 'accounting records have recorded expenditure with specific suppliers'. I'm not a civil servant, but as an example of how the figure could be this low, where I work mail is collected by staff from 'our' mailroom who sort it and decide which courier or mail service to use, of which Royal Mail is one. However, the operation of the mailroom is out-sourced, so Royal Mail are not our supplier, but our contractor's supplier. Even though our contractor tells us how much they spend, on our behalf, with each courier, our accounts would show expenditure with Royal Mail (only those items which, for some reason, do not go via the mailroom) of almost zero.komadorihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15718087459693071679noreply@blogger.com